![]() If it was so, all the judges who judge in such cases had to write a songs. One does not have to write a songs to call plagiarist a 'plagiarist'. ![]() ![]() I have wrote a few songs and it's not hard to be creative but it doesn't matter. She surely didn't pay royalties( even if she had credited, but she didn't) for George Gershwin or Michael Jackson, cause they were dead when she stole their music. Who's got credits for 'superstar' song on MDNA? Where are the credits for Main Source, Gutter Snypes, Pet Shop Boys, Bobby Byrd and many, many others? And, on a side-note: For these songs to have been legally sampled, as they INDEED were, the copyright holders for each piece of music, would have been paid an agreed-upon royalty, before the songs with the samples were ever performed publicly, & subsequently released on a recording."Īnd what about dozens of others she stole from but didn't sue her? :"IT IS A DOCUMENTED FACT THAT: Anytime that Madonna, or her Music Directors & Concert Producers, have used samples from other songs, in the arrangements for a particular performance (to add a deliberate, and well-thought-out, meaningful musical effect) Total credit has been given to the original songwriters/artists, for EVERY use of their music-absolutely EVERY time, that a 'sample' (be it a small snippet, or a lengthy overlay) from another artist's work occurs. My suggestion for dlackey75 and this Website's (& in particular, Madonna's manipulated, brainwashed fans).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |